Reliance, Tata and Indian Telecom
The dust seems to be settling now. Reliable media reports have indicated that patch up among brothers is almost final with the division of the flagship company that has propelled itself to great heights. Why am I enamored of Reliance? It is not due to the market capitalization or the size of the industry they have created. It is about the possibilities that these people have dreamt off and backing it up with a firm commitment and delivery. Arguably, they change the policies to their natural advantage and remain a blot on the corporate ethics. Yet, whatever they have done, they made sure that they are the leaders in the chosen field. This meant hiring the best brains for the job and getting it done.
In my earlier post on Reliance and the manner in which they have carved out the telecom scene, it remains clear that Reliance is a long-term volume player. This explains the thrust of the company in the rural areas offering unparalleled reach nationwide. It is clear that they have not shied from the rural telephony commitments and would soon be offering broadband access. The time limit invariably gets pushed further and further. In one of my earlier posts, I had mentioned that broadband push would be started off by the first week of March. Subsequent clarifications here. It is possible only by the end of this year. How this changes equation for other players, I shall detail a little later.
First and foremost the mobile telephony. As I mentioned about Reliance being a volume player, they have correctly identified the thrust in the rural markets. The major fact is that some of the areas are far lucrative than comparative urban areas. One of the factors I could think of is the untaxed agricultural income. That has no doubt created distortions in the economy and taxing it is a political hot potato; the fact remains that it is disposable income. Mobile phones have long gone beyond the elitist tag and it is easier to get one and service one.
How the other players have fared otherwise? Tata belatedly realized and rolled out its network in a hurry. The jury is still out about the quality of their network. According to media reports, they have avoided duplication of the infrastructure and instead rely on the existing players for the same. One end of the argument would commend them for the same. I feel that network infrastructure like towers and optic fiber etc. is sacrosanct. It is best to own one rather than rely on any other. How do these people justify on that count is beyond any reason. Well that is one man’s opinion!
Airtel is perceived to be elitist. Surprisingly, despite the fact that their license mandated compulsory rural services, they have not done so. If Airtel is to remain in contention, it has to change its advertising spend and branch out as a volume player. Still calls in the GSM networks are way to expensive.
As far as the fixed line networking costs are concerned, they remain high and that explains the reluctance of BSNL to invest in the same. It is hell bent on extracting the Access Deficit Charge in order to prop up its own inefficient structure. Instead, it could roll out CDMA based services in those areas where it has its optic fiber. CDMA was specifically designed for this purpose only. It can also support robust data transfers, as demonstrated by Reliance.
Broadband remains one of the key thrust areas for survival for any pan Indian telecom operator. The voice call charges cannot sustain the profits for these companies. A major regrettable fact is that Reliance is delaying its inevitable roll out.
Regrettable because, the existing customers are being snapped up by BSNL. Reliance plans to offer triple play of 100 Mbps through its vast optic fiber network. Its foray under the brand name Net Way, in one of the most keenly awaited events of Indian telecom. Reliance plans to foray in the cable TV distribution business. For that, it is amassing content in a big way. I have a feeling that it wants the regulatory mess to clear up. It wants a platform neutral delivery model. Direct to Home television is basically a non-starter barring Zee in the same. Once the regulations are firmly in place, it could give a major competition to established cable TV players. Introducing TiVO like functionality, Reliance hopes to capture the market far and wide. As the press release recently dictates, it opens up vast avenues for streaming video; content distribution and offer unexplored advertising channels. To capture the market, it could drop prices to sustain the losses and wipe out the existing players. That seems to be the strategy. It might even give away the set top box for free in the initial introductory offer. However, the details are hazy and I cannot confirm anything on that front now.
Tata is loosing out in this race. Clearly, they chose to concentrate in the metros where they believe that they could introduce “broadband†the Sify way. This would give them enough bad press anyway. As the market matures and the customers become more demanding, only the best would survive. Tata’s have had too many missed opportunities and it is their stone headedness to persist with the same follies time and again, which they can avoid. Data is the key to survival if one wants to capture the market.
It is risky to predict the future. As the market is evolving, Reliance seems to be the only long-term player along with Hutch. BSNL is a government agency; there could be increased demands for privatizing it and selling it off. As for Tata’s their heart does not seem to be in this business. Airtel might just sell out. What emerges from the fall out is Reliance straddling the entire telecom network from gateways to end user premises. Long time back, it was the official word from none other than the top boss. Once the valuation is achieved with the critical mass of subscribers, they too might exit the business. Or possibly extend their business to other countries. Indian experiment could be their showpiece to the world.
Discuss on: Sify Broadband, Tata Indicom, Airtel Broadband, Reliance Broadband, MTNL – BSNL Broadband, Dial Up, Others
This post was submitted by Dr. Abhishek Puri on the Broadband Blog on Techwhack.
|
TechWhack on Facebook
|

March 11th, 2005 at 06:06 am
Hi,
Just wondering why there is no name or discussion regarding Hutch or Idea Cellular Ltd. ? I believe when the comparision is being done one of the biggest players at GSM front should be taken into consideration. Well, considering only reliance and tata is not completing the artile.
March 11th, 2005 at 05:36 pm
Hi,
Just wondering why there is no name or discussion regarding Hutch or Idea Cellular Ltd. ? I believe when the comparision is being done one of the biggest players at GSM front should be taken into consideration. Well, considering only reliance and tata is not completing the artile.
March 11th, 2005 at 12:07 pm
Ruchi I dont use Idea or Hutch.Idea doesnt provide services here in my place.It doesnt make any sense to write back on what I dont have or had any feedback about. Stay tuned. I have something about the same very soon. For that you come back on the same website!
March 11th, 2005 at 11:37 pm
Ruchi I dont use Idea or Hutch.Idea doesnt provide services here in my place.It doesnt make any sense to write back on what I dont have or had any feedback about. Stay tuned. I have something about the same very soon. For that you come back on the same website!
March 29th, 2005 at 05:25 am
hi i am in india in v.v.nagar(388120) so any one tell me how to get broadband
March 29th, 2005 at 04:55 pm
hi i am in india in v.v.nagar(388120) so any one tell me how to get broadband
August 31st, 2005 at 05:20 pm
Dr. Puri, I cannot but help feel that you are a tad too uncharitable on Airtel. It did have the distinction of having the vision to expand a pan-India (albeit city-centric) telecom network comprising marrowband (GSM) and Broadband (POTS). I use both and (barring your correct observation – they could be cheaper!) I find their service pretty good! I also feel that your short observation that Airtel might sell out – is that a bad idea? I think most of the private Indian operators are headed that way. A general shakedown has been underway globally for some time now.
August 31st, 2005 at 06:50 am
Dr. Puri, I cannot but help feel that you are a tad too uncharitable on Airtel. It did have the distinction of having the vision to expand a pan-India (albeit city-centric) telecom network comprising marrowband (GSM) and Broadband (POTS). I use both and (barring your correct observation – they could be cheaper!) I find their service pretty good! I also feel that your short observation that Airtel might sell out – is that a bad idea? I think most of the private Indian operators are headed that way. A general shakedown has been underway globally for some time now.
September 21st, 2006 at 05:29 pm
Hi everyone,I’d like to know when Tata sky will launch the zee , sony and other channels.I heard there’s some difficulty getting transponders.At the moment,Dishtv does look way better but I dont want to take it cos of all the public criticism.Any reply wld be helpful.
Thanks
September 21st, 2006 at 06:59 am
Hi everyone,I’d like to know when Tata sky will launch the zee , sony and other channels.I heard there’s some difficulty getting transponders.At the moment,Dishtv does look way better but I dont want to take it cos of all the public criticism.Any reply wld be helpful.
Thanks
July 14th, 2009 at 05:23 pm
i believe most of us here have completly ignored the fact that tata has just launched their new GSM venture in alliance with NTT docomo, the top telecom company in Japan…and have any of you checked out their new tariff plans (http://www.tatadocomo.com/prepaid-plan-details.aspx)…their branding is very youth oriented and i guess many college students are gonna be diverted towards them..