<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TDSAT: Tata Sky is not obligated to carry all 32 Zee channels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky</link>
	<description>India Broadband and Telecom Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:12:29 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: L C Gautam</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-127251</link>
		<dc:creator>L C Gautam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 05:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-127251</guid>
		<description>Z classic chennal should be on Tata Sky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Z classic chennal should be on Tata Sky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inderjit Salwan</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-104890</link>
		<dc:creator>Inderjit Salwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-104890</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry GOD is looking Tata Sky will have to pay with cancellation of their DTH license</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry GOD is looking Tata Sky will have to pay with cancellation of their DTH license</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inderjit Salwan</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-122142</link>
		<dc:creator>Inderjit Salwan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-122142</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry GOD is looking Tata Sky will have to pay with cancellation of their DTH license</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry GOD is looking Tata Sky will have to pay with cancellation of their DTH license</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raju</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-39270</link>
		<dc:creator>raju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-39270</guid>
		<description>why this services provider will not give us option select the chennels what we wanted to see..?
raju</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why this services provider will not give us option select the chennels what we wanted to see..?<br />
raju</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raju</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-122141</link>
		<dc:creator>raju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 11:22:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-122141</guid>
		<description>why this services provider will not give us option select the chennels what we wanted to see..?&lt;br&gt;raju</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why this services provider will not give us option select the chennels what we wanted to see..?<br />raju</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Sharma</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-33921</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-33921</guid>
		<description>company has removed 13 zee channels including Zee Classic, Zee Action, Zee Music, ETC Music, zee sports etc from their service network.

This is just a eyewash.

I have gone through the judgment of the case (available on net at tdsat.nic.in). This case was filed by TATAKY against Zee for providing them channels with all bouquets at a price of Rs.83.85 and whereas TATASKy wanted only 02 bouquet comprising of 19 channels. Now they will be getting 19 Channels as liked by TATASKY at a price of 50 % of Rs 83.85 i.e. reduction in RS. 42/ per customer.

Tatasky has not reduced the prices and saved RS. 42 per customer. What a trick to earn revenue and be befool customers. I think TRAI should take look into such malpractices suo moto and asked TATASKY to maintain the same channels as offered in the initial package or to reduce the price by same.

The advertisement that TATASKY gave is also eyewash and bad since it influences the customers connoting that Tatasky is helpless since it is court order whereas this is not the case. 

I hope somebody is looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>company has removed 13 zee channels including Zee Classic, Zee Action, Zee Music, ETC Music, zee sports etc from their service network.</p>
<p>This is just a eyewash.</p>
<p>I have gone through the judgment of the case (available on net at tdsat.nic.in). This case was filed by TATAKY against Zee for providing them channels with all bouquets at a price of Rs.83.85 and whereas TATASKy wanted only 02 bouquet comprising of 19 channels. Now they will be getting 19 Channels as liked by TATASKY at a price of 50 % of Rs 83.85 i.e. reduction in RS. 42/ per customer.</p>
<p>Tatasky has not reduced the prices and saved RS. 42 per customer. What a trick to earn revenue and be befool customers. I think TRAI should take look into such malpractices suo moto and asked TATASKY to maintain the same channels as offered in the initial package or to reduce the price by same.</p>
<p>The advertisement that TATASKY gave is also eyewash and bad since it influences the customers connoting that Tatasky is helpless since it is court order whereas this is not the case. </p>
<p>I hope somebody is looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rupesh Sharma</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-122140</link>
		<dc:creator>Rupesh Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-122140</guid>
		<description>company has removed 13 zee channels including Zee Classic, Zee Action, Zee Music, ETC Music, zee sports etc from their service network.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just a eyewash.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have gone through the judgment of the case (available on net at tdsat.nic.in). This case was filed by TATAKY against Zee for providing them channels with all bouquets at a price of Rs.83.85 and whereas TATASKy wanted only 02 bouquet comprising of 19 channels. Now they will be getting 19 Channels as liked by TATASKY at a price of 50 % of Rs 83.85 i.e. reduction in RS. 42/ per customer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tatasky has not reduced the prices and saved RS. 42 per customer. What a trick to earn revenue and be befool customers. I think TRAI should take look into such malpractices suo moto and asked TATASKY to maintain the same channels as offered in the initial package or to reduce the price by same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The advertisement that TATASKY gave is also eyewash and bad since it influences the customers connoting that Tatasky is helpless since it is court order whereas this is not the case. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope somebody is looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>company has removed 13 zee channels including Zee Classic, Zee Action, Zee Music, ETC Music, zee sports etc from their service network.</p>
<p>This is just a eyewash.</p>
<p>I have gone through the judgment of the case (available on net at tdsat.nic.in). This case was filed by TATAKY against Zee for providing them channels with all bouquets at a price of Rs.83.85 and whereas TATASKy wanted only 02 bouquet comprising of 19 channels. Now they will be getting 19 Channels as liked by TATASKY at a price of 50 % of Rs 83.85 i.e. reduction in RS. 42/ per customer.</p>
<p>Tatasky has not reduced the prices and saved RS. 42 per customer. What a trick to earn revenue and be befool customers. I think TRAI should take look into such malpractices suo moto and asked TATASKY to maintain the same channels as offered in the initial package or to reduce the price by same.</p>
<p>The advertisement that TATASKY gave is also eyewash and bad since it influences the customers connoting that Tatasky is helpless since it is court order whereas this is not the case. </p>
<p>I hope somebody is looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Prasad</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-33833</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-33833</guid>
		<description>In this fight of TataSky and Dish, I think that the Consumer is a loser. Tata Sky was prompt in removing the channels from their DTH service without informing the consumers. 

While pricing the package they show certail list of channels and then remove them without reducing the pricing or even informing the customers. I think that Tat Sky has been very unprofessional in their approach and are cheating the consumers.

Earlier in the month they had removed Neo sports channels while continuig to show them as a part of packege on their advertisement booklets and website.

Is their a method available to safeguard the consumer interest in this big fight (incidently I had always known that competition leaves consumers more satisfied and not poorer !!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this fight of TataSky and Dish, I think that the Consumer is a loser. Tata Sky was prompt in removing the channels from their DTH service without informing the consumers. </p>
<p>While pricing the package they show certail list of channels and then remove them without reducing the pricing or even informing the customers. I think that Tat Sky has been very unprofessional in their approach and are cheating the consumers.</p>
<p>Earlier in the month they had removed Neo sports channels while continuig to show them as a part of packege on their advertisement booklets and website.</p>
<p>Is their a method available to safeguard the consumer interest in this big fight (incidently I had always known that competition leaves consumers more satisfied and not poorer !!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manish Prasad</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-122139</link>
		<dc:creator>Manish Prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-122139</guid>
		<description>In this fight of TataSky and Dish, I think that the Consumer is a loser. Tata Sky was prompt in removing the channels from their DTH service without informing the consumers. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While pricing the package they show certail list of channels and then remove them without reducing the pricing or even informing the customers. I think that Tat Sky has been very unprofessional in their approach and are cheating the consumers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier in the month they had removed Neo sports channels while continuig to show them as a part of packege on their advertisement booklets and website.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is their a method available to safeguard the consumer interest in this big fight (incidently I had always known that competition leaves consumers more satisfied and not poorer !!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this fight of TataSky and Dish, I think that the Consumer is a loser. Tata Sky was prompt in removing the channels from their DTH service without informing the consumers. </p>
<p>While pricing the package they show certail list of channels and then remove them without reducing the pricing or even informing the customers. I think that Tat Sky has been very unprofessional in their approach and are cheating the consumers.</p>
<p>Earlier in the month they had removed Neo sports channels while continuig to show them as a part of packege on their advertisement booklets and website.</p>
<p>Is their a method available to safeguard the consumer interest in this big fight (incidently I had always known that competition leaves consumers more satisfied and not poorer !!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunipam</title>
		<link>http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680-tdsat-tata-sky#comment-33616</link>
		<dc:creator>sunipam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 07:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sifybroadband.techwhack.com/680/tdsat-tata-sky/#comment-33616</guid>
		<description>which channels will be off aired from tata sky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>which channels will be off aired from tata sky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
